Archive for the ‘The Federal Reserve Board’ Category

Forever Blowing Bubbles

Friday, May 17th, 2013

“I’m forever blowing bubbles,
Pretty bubbles in the air
They fly so high, nearly reach the sky
And like my dreams they fade and die.”

                                     From “Forever Blowing Bubbles”

Bubbles are everywhere, according to Bill Gross, aka The Bond King.

According to Gross, there’s a bubble in Treasuries, a bubble in narrow credit spreads and a bubble in high-yield prices.  The stock market appears to be in a bubble, too.

The problem with bubbles is that we won’t know we’re in one until it pops.  And when it pops, it’s too late to do anything about it.  A bubble can cause all sorts of problems, as you may recall from the dot-com bubble in the ‘90s and the housing bubble in 2008.

(more…)

Blame It on Sequestration

Friday, May 3rd, 2013

President Obama and the Federal Aviation Administration blamed recent flight delays on sequestration.  Now the Federal Reserve Board’s Open Market Committee is blaming sequestration for the poor performance of the U.S. economy.

Both claims are equally frivolous.

As The Wall Street Journal noted, “The FAA’s all-hands furloughs managed to convert a less than 4% FAA budget cut into a 10% air-traffic control cut that would delay 40% of flights. The 6,700 flights that the FAA threatened to force off schedule every day is twice as many delays as the single worst travel day of 2012.”

With members of Congress among those affected by the flight delays, Congress acted with uncharacteristic quickness and approved a bill to revoke FAA’s politically motivated furloughs.

(more…)

90,000,000 Americans Have Stopped Working

Friday, April 5th, 2013

When the unemployment rate declines, even by a little bit, it should be good news.  But when it declines because people are leaving the workforce in record numbers, it’s not.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that the unemployment rate is now 7.6%, down from 7.7%.  But this 0.1% drop is due entirely to a drop in the labor force by 663,000 in March.

Non-farm payroll was expected to increase by 190,000 in March, with the lowest forecast at 100,000.  Instead, it increased by a meager 88,000 jobs.

As Zerohedge.com reported, a record 90 million Americans are no longer even looking for work.  The labor force participation rate dropped from 63.55% to just 63.3% – its lowest level since 1979.

The BLS reports the U-6 unemployment rate for March at 13.8%, which is a more accurate number than the U-3 rate of 7.6%, as it includes those who have been unemployed long-term.

(more…)

Ben, the Great and Powerful

Friday, March 22nd, 2013

“Bernanke said, in essence, that he wasn’t a magician.”

                                                    Heidi Moore, The Guardian

The number one movie in America today, “Oz, the Great and Powerful,” could be a metaphor about The Federal Reserve Board and its role in the American economy.

Oz, a likable scoundrel, is a master of illusion.  There is no substance behind his tricks, but they give the illusion of strength, and, since people believe what they want to believe, he is able to overcome the forces of evil.

Likewise, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s prestidigitation relies on quantitative easing to create the illusion of strength.  All appears well when the stock market rises and the unemployment rate drops, even if there is no strength behind the market’s rise and the drop in unemployment is by only 0.2%.

Of course, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has its own illusionists, as we’ve pointed out in the past, who are able to make a 14.4% unemployment rate look like a 7.7% unemployment rate.

(more…)

Follow The Fed At Your Own Risk

Friday, March 1st, 2013

If you think Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has a firm grasp of the economy, you may change your mind after listening to Bain Capital co-founder Coleman Andrews quoting Chairman Bernanke in the accompanying video.

Andrews cites three quotes that show The Fed czar was out of touch with economic reality during the run up to the Great Recession.  And now, he asks, “would you trust your life-savings to an institution with that recent record of completely missing what happened in the housing sector and more broadly in the economy?”

It’s A Correction for Nasdaq, Russell Indexes

Friday, November 16th, 2012

Stock markets have become increasingly bearish since the election.

With the fiscal cliff approaching, and little confidence that Democrats and Republicans will agree on a solution to avoid it, the Nasdaq Composite Index, which includes many technology stocks, and the small-stock Russell 2000 Index are now in correction territory.

A bear market takes place when the market drops 20% or more.  A correction takes place when the market drops 10% or more.  Both indexes are down more than 10% since reaching highs in mid-September.

As The Federal Reserve Board’s quantitative easing drove investors to put money in riskier assets, both indexes soared earlier this year.  Since the third round of quantitative easing (QE3) began, though, both indexes have been heading down.

While Republicans agreed immediately after the election to accept some increase in taxes, President Obama has said that he will seek $1.6 trillion in tax increases, which is twice what he previously suggested and is far off what Republicans are willing to accept.

In addition to being driven down by the fiscal cliff, markets are being depressed by continuing turmoil in Europe, and the economic slowdown and change in leadership in China.

QErased

Until recently, markets were heading up, driven higher by quantitative easing programs in Europe, as well as the U.S.

Noting that quantitative easing was no longer having a positive impact on the markets and that, in fact, the market spikes it caused were starting to ebb, we shared the following chart with clients in our monthly letter.

The “Draghi Spike” refers to European Central Bank (ECB) President Mario Draghi.  The “FOMC Spike” refers to the U.S. Federal Open Market Committee, led by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.

The S&P 500 is now within striking distance of the low end of the Draghi spike, at which point any gains from the latest rounds of quantitative easing will have been erased.

This outcome is no surprise.  As with government stimulus spending, the positive impact of quantitative easing is temporary.  In addition, each successive round becomes less effective than the previous round.

It wouldn’t matter if quantitative easing had no other impact, except to boost the stock market, but that’s not the case.  It also encourages risky investment and can cause new problems, such as inflation.

And it really does nothing to heal a sick economy.  It’s like drinking alcohol to relieve stress.  It hides the problem, rather than addressing it.

The latest quantitative easing program was supposed to help ease unemployment.  That seems not to have happened.

Neither stimulus spending nor quantitative easing have had much of an impact on the economy.  So what do we do now?

Going For Broke

Friday, September 14th, 2012

So The Fed is “all in.”  QE3, the third round of quantitative easting, will continue until the unemployment rate drops to an acceptable level.

The implication is that buying bonds will improve the unemployment rate, which has been over 8% for a record 43 months.  Yet if unemployment remained high after QE1, QE2 and Operation Twist, why should QE3 be any different?

The unemployment rate, of course, is bound to drop sooner or later.  When it does, will The Fed take credit and claim that QE3 is the reason?

Granted, this round of QE is different from the others, as The Fed will be buying $40 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities a month.

Added to existing bond buying, that will come to $85 billion a month through the end of the year.  If unemployment doesn’t drop, the Fed said it will buy even more bonds!

So we’ve come full circle since 2008, when the financial system nearly went bust by … investing in mortgage-backed securities.

Bernanke’s “On the Other Hand” Speech

Friday, August 31st, 2012

To the disappointment of many on Wall Street, and to the relief of many in the real world, the Federal Reserve Board did not announce a third quantitative easing program (QE3) today.

But Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke did not rule out a QE3 in the future.

Op-ed writers and politicians are often criticized for taking an “on the other hand” approach, in which they combine criticism and praise in the same commentary or speech.  Of course, Mr. Bernanke is not an op-ed writer, but his highly anticipated Jackson Hole speech today would certainly qualify as an “on the other hand” speech.  Both supporters and opponents of ongoing monetary easing could find plenty to like – and plenty to dislike – in what he had to say.

Consider a few excerpts from Reuters:

“Taking due account of the uncertainties and limits of its policy tools, the Federal Reserve will provide additional policy accommodation as needed to promote a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions in a context of price stability.”

Sounds like QE3 is coming!

“Key sectors such as manufacturing, housing, and international trade have strengthened, firms’ investment in equipment and software has rebounded, and conditions in financial and credit markets have improved.”

Oh, wait … I guess we don’t need it.

“ … the costs of nontraditional policies, when considered carefully, appear manageable, implying that we should not rule out the further use of such policies if economic conditions warrant.”

Yes, there will be a QE3!

” … the bar for the use of nontraditional policies is higher than for traditional policies. In addition, in the present context, nontraditional policies share the limitations of monetary policy more generally.”

Well, no … I guess not.

Also of interest, he says that, “It is critical that fiscal policymakers put in place a credible plan that sets the federal budget on a sustainable trajectory in the medium and longer runs.”

Keep in mind that Congress has not passed a budget in three years.  On the other hand:

“However, policymakers should take care to avoid a sharp near-term fiscal contraction that could endanger the recovery.”

So there will be no QE3 now.  On the other hand …

The Fed and Facebook

Friday, August 24th, 2012

On the surface, The Federal Reserve Board and Facebook have nothing in common.

But media speculation about Fed action is very similar to the speculation that preceded Facebook’s IPO.

For a year or so before the IPO, it seemed that every business reporter was writing about when Facebook’s IPO would take place.  While some of the better journalists talked to analysts who questioned the company’s valuation, there was also a great deal of hype about the impact Facebook’s IPO was going to have on the economy and on the environment for IPOs.

Goggle “Facebook IPO” and you’ll find 122,000,000 results!

Yet it would be an understatement to say that Facebook has failed to live up to expectations.  The stock has been trading at well below its IPO offering price and, rather than give a boost to other IPOs, Facebook’s offering has discouraged other companies from going public.

More recently, media has been buzzing with speculation about another round of quantitative easing by The Fed.

It may not happen, although recent economic news of weakening economies in Europe, China and the U.S. may lead to Fed action.  Minutes from the Federal Open Market Committee’s July meeting, which were just released on Wednesday, also suggest Fed “accommodation.”

As we noted in our previous blog entry, the U.S. stock market has been riding high of late, based on speculation about Fed action, although since then dismal economic news has been taking its toll.

However, as we said in our previous post, two rounds of quantitative easing have done little to help the economy and a third is likely to have the same result – especially since the market already jumped higher in anticipation of round three.

However, the other consequence of this speculation is that the dollar is weakening.  If QE3 takes place, it would add to inflationary pressure and rising prices will make it even more difficult for consumers to make purchases.

So, like Facebook, The Fed action is likely to a big disappointment.

Global Weakening

While the market has been rallying in anticipation of Fed action, this week investors decided that bad economic news outweighed any positive influence from potential Fed action.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) fell for four straight days.  Why?  As The Wall Street Journal summarized, “In the U.S., new jobless figures disappointed. A report on manufacturing in China showed the biggest drop in nine months for the world’s second-largest economy. In Europe, a widely watched survey suggested that business activity across the continent continued a recent contraction in August.

Germany—Europe’s usual engine of growth—faced its biggest decline in new orders in three years, according to data provider Markit.”

Some will take heart, knowing that this weakening will increase pressure on The Fed to take action.  Others will not.

Stock Rally Built On Wishful Thinking

Monday, August 20th, 2012

“This is the most disrespected rally I’ve ever seen.”

John Buckingham, Al Frank Asset Management

Stock prices have rallied and are closing in on their highest level in five years.  After six consecutive weeks of gains, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up 9.7% since early June.

Any increase in stock prices is, of course, good news.  But the market rally has little to do with market fundamentals.  It’s not due to improved corporate earnings, higher employment or other economic news.

The market has been rallying based on the belief that The Federal Reserve Board will approve another round of quantitative easing.

A rally built on wishful thinking is a rally that should be approached with caution.  Investors have, indeed, been cautious, withdrawing $70 billion from stock mutual funds since the year began.  Likewise, trading volume has been low.

With the economy showing signs of tepid improvement, it is becoming less and less likely that The Fed will move forward with another round of quantitative easing (QE3).  And if The Fed does not take action, investors fear that the rally will not only come to an end, but gains based on the potential for another round of quantitative easing will turn to losses.

So what will happen if The Fed moves forward with QE3?  Like QE1 and QE2, it will likely have much, if any, economic impact.  In fact, it’s a given that each round of quantitative easing will be less effective than the one before it.

Like previous rounds of easing, investors could expect stock prices to rise, as quantitative easing makes stocks more attractive relative to other investments.  Except, given that the market has already rallied in anticipation of QE3, announcing QE3 may have little impact at this point.