Last week, the ECB began its purchase of €60 billion ($64.2 billion) a month in Eurozone government bonds, with total purchases expected to eventually exceed €1 trillion.
Posts Tagged ‘Quantitative Easing’
“When real interest rates start to move up, that’s when the crisis could hit.”
So the Federal Reserve Board spent six years and boosted its bond portfolio to $4 trillion in an effort to boost the rate of inflation to 2%.
How did that go? Not so well.
This week, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) declined 0.7% in January on a seasonally adjusted basis. It was the third consecutive month of decline; over the past year, the “all-items index” decreased 0.1% before seasonal adjustment.
In other words, the U.S. has joined Europe and is in deflation mode. It’s the first time the CPI hit negative territory for the year since the beginning of the financial crisis in 2009. Imagine how low prices would be if the Fed didn’t buy all those bonds!
That dropping oil prices caused U.S. deflation underscores the foolishness of the Fed fantasy about a 2% inflation rate.
As David Stockman’s Contra Corner put it, “the CPI measure of inflation is so distorted by imputations, geometric means, hedonic adjustments and numerous other artifices, that targeting to 2% versus 1% or even a zero rate of short-term measured consumer price inflation is a completely arbitrary, unreliable and unachievable undertaking. Yet, (Fed Chair Janet) Yellen’s latest exercise in monetary pettifoggery is apparently driven by just that purpose … ”
When the economy recovers, interest rates will go up, right?
That’s been the Federal Reserve Board’s line for years now. Yet as the Fed gushes about an allegedly booming economy, some are saying that interest rates are unlikely to increase this year.
Last week’s Federal Open Market Committee Statement, which summarizes monetary policy, noted that since the FOMC’s December meeting, “the economy has been expanding at a solid pace.” The statement notes that the unemployment rate is declining, consumer spending is increasing and, if not for that troublesome housing market, everything would be just dandy.
As if to put an exclamation point on the FOMC statement, Fed Chair Janet Yellen met with Congressional Democrats last week to reiterate just how fine the economy is doing. (The real purpose of the meeting may have been to explain the FOMC statement to members of Congress, as it contains phrases such as, “underutilization of labor resources continues to diminish;” which could have been worded more clearly by saying, “Many former middle managers are still working as greeters at WalMart.”) (more…)
“It is said that the Swiss love only money … this is not true. They also love gold.” Anonymous
The last time we checked, Switzerland was still part of Europe.
Then again, Switzerland has long been different from its European brethren. Switzerland is historically an observer, not a participant. Neutrality gives the country points for ethics among the peace-loving folk – although it didn’t stop the Swiss from dealing with the Nazis during World War II.
Switzerland is also “the vault of the world.” It’s where money and wealth are omnipresent, but never talked about. “Swiss” and “bank” go together like “Swiss” and “watch.”
But there’s a big difference between the Swiss National Bank and the European Central Bank. While the ECB is likely to announce a quantitative easing program to fight deflation next week, Switzerland this week strengthened its currency with a surprise announcement that it was removing its cap on the value of the Swiss franc.
Let’s pretend that the United States economy is a football team. The coach calls the play. The running back runs right up the middle and is thrown for a loss. What does the coach do on the next play? Run the ball up the middle for a loss. And the play after that? Run the ball up the middle for a loss. And the play after that? Run the ball up the middle for a loss.
Other teams see what’s happening to the U.S. economy. So what do they do? Run the ball up the middle for a loss. In Japan, in Europe and elsewhere the losses mount. What’s the conclusion?
- Running the ball up the middle every play will result in a loss, or
- We need to run the ball up the middle more often.
The answer, if you’re paying attention to central banks and the actions of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is, of course, B., as logic and politics rarely travel on the same highway.
Formerly the world’s number two economy behind the U.S., Japan’s future couldn’t have been brighter back in the ’80s, when “Japan Inc.” was all the rage. Today, if there really was a Japan Inc., it would have long ago declared bankruptcy. The “Land of the Rising Sun” has become the “Land of the Setting Sun.”
It may be a good time to plan that European vacation. The long-weak dollar is gaining strength again, which means you may be able to afford good food, good wine and a quality hotel if you visit the Old World.
During the Fed Reign of the past five-plus years, the dollar was like that elderly lady in the commercials who says, “I’ve fallen and I can’t get up.” Other countries tried to help by weakening their currencies, of course, but the resulting currency wars appear to have ended along with quantitative easing and now the dollar is strong and getting stronger.
The good news is that the strengthening dollar will make foreign goods cheaper for American consumers (so much for boosting inflation). American companies may also reduce prices or keep them from rising to remain competitive.
As a result, Americans will spend less on essentials like oil and will have more money left to spend on other things, which should boost the economy. A strong dollar will also attract foreign investors to American assets, such as U.S. Treasury bonds.
The bad news is that consumer spending on imports will increase the trade deficit – in fact, it already has. American companies that rely on exports or that have multi-national locations will be hurt.
So the Federal Reserve Board has made it official. This is the end of quantitative easing. It’s quits for QE. Bond buying has gone bye bye. Quantitative easing has been eased out of existence, tapered into extinction. The QE case is closed.
If nothing else, QE has provided us with material for more of our blog posts than any other topic (55, not including this one!), so, given that we’ll now need a new source of inspiration, we’re almost sorry to see it end.
So is this an obituary for the greatest (in terms of dollars involved, if not in results) experiment ever in monetary policy? Should we hoist up the “Mission Accomplished” banner, pop the champagne cork and make a toast to Ben Bernanke and his brethren?
Not so fast. There’s still an epilogue worth drafting. Closure is needed. This may be our last chance to take a shot at QE, so we’re taking advantage of it.
Yes, we’ve already discussed the word “considerable” at considerable length, in relation to its use by the Federal Reserve Board in its recent policy statement.
But apparently we are on to something of a considerable size. Maybe it was a slow news day, but The New York Times devoted an article to the Fed’s use of the word, noting that “Federal Reserve officials are looking for a new way to reassure investors that they are not ready to start raising interest rates.”
Commenting on the “considerable time” reference in the policy statement, The New York Times article reported that an account of the meeting “suggests that officials are trying to find a new way to say the same thing.”
Think about that. Unemployment remains high, inflation goals are not being met, the Fed is holding trillions in bonds it will eventually have to sell and the stock market is acting wobbly … but the Fed is looking for a “new way” to say “considerable.”
Fed Chair Janet Yellen could just say the Fed is not ready to start raising interest rates. She could say the Fed is not planning to raise rates “for a long time,” which would be reassuring to investors. Or members of the Federal Open Market Committee could go to an online thesaurus and come up with more than a dozen synonyms in seconds.
“When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.”
Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass
The word for today is “considerable,” as in interest rates will remain low for “a considerable time.”
How long is “a considerable time?”
Long enough, apparently, for investors, who boosted the stock market to yet another new record this week, after Federal Reserve Board Chair Janet Yellen announced that the Fed would keep interest rates near historic lows for “a considerable time.” The Dow Jones Industrial Average crossed 17,200 for the first time ever, closing at a new high of 17,157.
Apparently, investors are like kittens, because, as Alice notes, “whatever you say to them, they always purr.”
CNN Money interprets, with certainty, that “considerable” means summer 2015 “at the earliest.” Yet The Wall Street Journal, referring to the policy statement, admitted, “we have no idea what it says about the future of monetary policy. We doubt even Fed Chair Janet Yellen knows.”
“Better say nothing at all. Language is worth a thousand pounds a word!”
Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass
Having read the policy statement, we conclude that it means whatever you want it to mean, as it contains more hedges than the Palace of Versailles. Consider this single sentence …
“The Committee continues to anticipate (hedge 1), based on its assessment of these factors (hedge 2), that it likely will be appropriate (hedge 3) to maintain the current target range for the federal funds rate for a considerable time after the asset purchase program ends, especially if projected inflation continues to run below the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run goal (hedge 4), and provided that (hedge 5) longer-term inflation expectations remain well anchored.”