You’re Breaking the Law

How many laws have you broken today?

It’s impossible to know for sure, given that regulations now affect just about every facet of our lives. That’s doubly true for businesses, which were not exactly coddled by the Obama Administration (although exceptions were made for generous Democratic donors, such as Goldman Sachs and Tom Steyer).Productivity

The federal tax code alone is now 74,608 pages long, or 187 times longer than it was a century ago. Depending on what you include and how you count the pages, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has produced anywhere from 10,000 to 20,000 pages of new regulations, while the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, developed to increase oversight of the financial industry and reduce risk, has produced more than 22,000 pages of regulations.

The regulatory state was taken to a new level by President Obama, who didn’t even bother getting support from Congress during his second term. He and the bureaucratic brethren (and sistren) he appointed to regulate worked overtime and broke all records for creating new laws to restrict our freedom, stifle economic growth, concentrate power in Washington and prevent the new Republican administration from doing its job.

That making America great again isn’t the goal of the Obama Administration is made clear by the volume of new regulations being approved. In August, we reported that he set a record by becoming the first president to approve 600 major rules (e.g., rules that each impose a cost of more $100 million). While George W. Bush was no slouch, having approved 496 major rules during his two terms as president, Obama blew past him and just kept going.

The American Action Forum noted that in the 36 working days between the election and year end, he’s approved 41 more major rules—or 145 new regulations in all, which is a tad over four per day.

“The Obama Administration’s midnight regulation bender has been something to behold,” The Wall Street Journal noted.

The odds that he’s read any of those new regulations, never mind analyzing them, are about zero, which is why it’s safe to conclude that he’s merely trying to gum up the works for the other party.

Trump, Republicans Uniting on Deregulation

Whether you’re in mourning over Hillary Clinton’s loss or are a diehard Trumpkin, one thing you should consider supporting during the new Republican Congress-Trump presidency is the effort to deregulate.

The Competitive Enterprise Institute estimates that regulatory compliance costs the average family $14,976 a year, or about 29% of the budget. It exceeds the amount spent on health care, food and transportation. It also exceeds the amount the IRS expects to collect in both individual and corporate income taxes—by more than $160 billion a year.

Based on data provided by federal agencies, the American Action Forum calculated that the economic cost of just the new regulations imposed by the Obama administration adds up to $743 billion per year.

The new Congress is already taking up a potential repeal-and-replace or at least a serious revision to the ACA, which has failed to achieve its projected level of enrollment, while causing major increases in premiums for those signing up through the federal government. And, of course, you can’t keep your doctor.

Congress is also seeking the authority to expand the 1996 Congressional Review Act so that Congress would be able to wipe out multiple midnight regulations in a single vote, rather than having to hold individual votes to repeal them.

In addition, President-elect Trump has created the position of Special Advisor on Deregulation, naming shareholder activist Carl Icahn to fill it, while Paul Atkins, a former member of the Securities and Exchange Commission, has been named to lead deregulation of the financial sector.

Regulation Slowing Economic Growth

We’ve frequently railed against the overabundance of regulation we’ve witnessed in recent years, claiming that its slowing economic growth.

Common sense would suggest as much, but now studies are beginning to back up our claim.

A recent analysis reported in The Wall Street Journal says that regulatory risk for corporate America has increased nearly 80% during the past six years, causing a drop in both corporate investment and employment. Even as the Federal Reserve Board held interest rates close to zero, capital expenditures fell by nearly $32 billion between 2010 and 2015, while major corporations cut more than 1.1 million jobs, the analysis found.

Studies also show that expanding regulation slows down productivity growth, which is key to economic growth. In a 2014 study, the Mercatus Center at George Mason University found that the least regulated industries outperformed the most regulated industries. The least regulated enjoyed 63% growth in output per employee, 64% growth in output per hour and a 4% decline in unit labor costs for the period 1997 to 2010. The most regulated experienced only 33% growth in output per employee, 34% growth in output per hour and a 20% increase in unit labor costs.

So it’s likely no coincidence that productivity growth has averaged just 1.3% a year since 2007, while it averaged twice that rate of growth during the pre-Obama years of 2000 to 2007.

The Competitive Enterprise Institute’s annual survey of the size, scope and cost of federal regulations found that Federal regulations cost American consumers and businesses an estimated $1.88 trillion in 2014 in lost economic productivity and higher prices.

So it’s reassuring that Donald Trump and the Republican majority in Congress have chosen deregulation as a major goal.

Will Democrats play along? Not likely. Consider just a few quotes from the left-wing media that helped make Democrats the minority party:

Salon is already calling for a Trump impeachment because he’s not adopting Obama’s agenda and taking it farther to the left. Note to Salon: Trump won the election and is doing what he was elected to do. On what grounds should he be impeached? Do you want Mike Pence as president or will you try to impeach him for not being a socialist, too?

The Huffington Post likewise favors impeachment, saying resisting Trump is not enough: “We should stop his appointments, decry his PR efforts on jobs, chide him for his love affair with Putin and atomic weapons, defend the social programs he threatens to destroy, ridicule him for his climate change denials, advocate for groups he threatens to deport or discriminate against and, most importantly, impeach him as soon as possible for his disregard for the constitution.”

That quote is especially rich, given that practically every action taken by President Obama during his second term showed a disregard for the constitution.

And Between the Lines says, “The real estate mogul is building an administration made up of multi-millionaires and multi-billionaires, many of whom are connected to the fossil fuel industry, proclaim climate change to be a hoax, favor the privatization of education, Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, and advocate across-the-board corporate, banking and environmental deregulation.”

Hiring rich people! Deregulating! The horror of it all!

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments are closed.